Right to Information - A Gateway to battle Corruption
The idea that Government withhold information for that public has become outdated. Over the past decade, many countries have enacted legislations on freedom of information. In India, the Official Secrets Act 1923 was enacted to protect the official secrets. The newest law intend to disclose information replacing the ' culture of secrecy '. It'll promote public accountability that will trim the malpractices, mismanagement, abuse of discretion and bribery etc. - politics
OBJECTIVES: The object of RTI is to empower the citizens, promote transparency and accountability inside the working of the Government. The Act is a huge step towards making the citizens accustomed to the activities of the Government. Social Activist Aruna Roy has described India's RTI as " one of the most fundamental law america has seen."
EFFECT OF RIGHT TO INFORMATION: Even though the debate on corruption in the nation rages on, the RTI Act is fast growing as an effective anti- corruption tool.
Jan Lok Pal Bill gained tremendous public support with citizens coming out on the streets of Delhi, Bangalore and other cities to voice their anger over corruption. Where RTI has been utilized by journalists as well as the media, the law features a broad base of users. Earlier directly to freedom of speech and expression is granted under Article 19(1) of Constitution, however it requires fair and efficient procedure to help make the freedom of information work. Within the first three years, 2 million RTI requests were filed. The first and well known movement was by Mazdoor Kissan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) in Rajasthan for that access to village accounts. Case studies and media reports implies that RTI is being used to redress individual grievances, access entitlements such as Ration Cards and pension. The RTI has paved method for informed citizenry which may strengthen the democratic Government asia. With this Act, we can use our to speech and expressions and control the federal government activities effectively. The idea of open Government has become a reality with the implementation of RTI Act. The RTI may be called a success as long as the bureaucracy accepts that they have constitutional to serve into.
PROVISIONS OF RTI: Section 3 says all citizens shall have right to information. The Act enforces a duty upon the public authorities to disclosed all information. In V.S.Lee V. State of Kerala.. the remedy given by Parliament is that wherever there's substantial financial support, individuals, have the right to know or information. Section 4(2) states that every public authority shall take constant steps to provide information suo moto to the public. Thus, the police have to give information voluntarily so that the public have minimum turn to use this Act. People authorities also have to disseminate (making known or communicated the information to the public through notice boards, newspapers, public announcements, media broad casts, internet and inspection of offices of public authority) information widely of any type which is easily accessible towards the public. Information can be acquired by request in writing or through electronic means in English or Hindi or perhaps in official language with the area U/S 6. Here, the individual has to give fees, and if request can't be made in writing, the Central PIO and State PIO shall render all assist with make request written form. If the information has been provided correctly or within time, it might be made available by appeal or complaint for the Information Commission U/S (8(a) 1). Inside the Registrar General V. K.U. Rajasekar, it was held that Section 8 of RTI specially handles the cases of exemption from disclosure or information when similarly info affects prejudicially the sovereignty and security asia etc. Section 5 says every public authority shall within 100 events of enactment of the Act, designate as much as officers as the Central Public Information Officers or State Public Information Officers. - politics